Summary: Researchers have developed a dynamic method to track rapid brain activity changes, especially related to craving. Unlike traditional neuroimaging, which captures only a snapshot of brain activity, this approach provides a real-time view of how craving fluctuates.
The study found that people who experience strong cravings spend more time in brain states that amplify craving while failing to engage brain networks that reduce craving. These findings could improve understanding of neurological disorders like addiction and highlight the importance of brain network engagement over time.
Key Facts:
Individuals with strong cravings stayed longer in brain networks tied to craving.
A lack of engagement in brain regions linked to reduced craving was observed.
The study reveals rapid changes in brain activity, helping to understand disorders like addiction.
Source: Yale
Communication between regions of the brain is constantly in flux, but the neuroimaging technologies used to analyze these interactions typically provide only a snapshot representing several minutes’ worth of changes in brain activity, obscuring moment-to-moment changes.
Using a more dynamic approach, Yale researchers were able to observe rapid changes in brain activity — particularly related to the experience of craving.
The reduced engagement of the negative craving network may be particularly important, researchers say. Credit: Neuroscience News
This more nuanced view, researchers say, provides a better understanding of how brain activity shifts over time and how it might go awry in neurological disorders.
The findings were recently published in the journal Molecular Psychiatry.
Previous research has shown that activity between brain regions can, among other insights, predict the intensity of a person’s “craving,” or their strong desire for something such as food or alcohol.
“But on top of identifying what brain regions are involved in craving, I think how people engage these networks of brain regions over time also has implications,” said Jean Ye, lead author of the study and a Ph.D. student at Yale School of Medicine (YSM). “In this study, we wanted to investigate whether people who experience stronger craving engage and stay in certain brain networks more than people with less craving.”
Ye works in the labs of Elizabeth Goldfarb, an assistant professor of psychiatry, and Dustin Scheinost, an associate professor of radiology and biomedical imaging, both of YSM and co-senior authors of the study.
For the study, 425 participants — including healthy individuals and people with alcohol use disorder, cocaine use disorder, prenatal cocaine exposure, or obesity — underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while either viewing neutral images (such as landscapes) or descriptions of relaxing situations (sitting in a park or reading a book, for example).
During these periods, participants were also asked to rate their level of craving for alcohol, cocaine, or food on a scale that ranged from no craving at all to very strong craving.
Then, to evaluate brain activity related to craving specifically, the researchers combined two methods. First, they used a portion of the fMRI images — as well as the participants’ craving scores - to train a machine learning model that identified brain activity networks related to craving.
The model found two networks: one in which stronger connectivity between brain regions predicted stronger craving (positive craving network) and another in which stronger connectivity predicted weaker craving (negative craving network).
Then, the researchers applied a technique to detect rapid changes in activity between pairs of brain regions.
“We saw that people who experienced stronger cravings spent more time in the network state that is more positively associated with craving. They seemed to show ‘sticky,’ persistent engagement of this positive network state,” said Ye. “At the same time, they were not dwelling in or engaging as much in the negative craving network state.”
The reduced engagement of the negative craving network may be particularly important, researchers say. That network included brain regions involved in sensory processing and initiation of movement.
In previous studies, crosstalk between those regions has been found to be associated with decreased impulsivity and reduced cocaine use. Recruiting the negative craving network, therefore, may lead to more self-regulation and inhibition of habit-based behaviors linked to substance use.
The combination of getting “stuck” in brain activity linked to strong craving and the inability to tap into the activity linked to a weaker sense of craving suggests an imbalance between cognitive stability and flexibility, said Ye. And that might indicate impaired cognitive control, which is closely linked to substance use.
Another takeaway, said Ye, is that how one engages these types of networks over time plays a key role in experience and behavior. This is likely true for other states such as stress, which the researchers are looking into now, or rumination, a dwelling on negative thoughts or feelings.
“For instance, we’d like to know whether people at risk for or diagnosed with depression engage in rumination brain networks more and stay engaged for longer periods than those without depression,” said Ye.
“Those are the kinds of questions we can ask with this approach.”
Interesting work - that I hope leads to solutions.
ReplyDeleteThey need to pick up the pace.
DeleteBeauty causes neurons
ReplyDeleteTo dance and play,
Neuroaesthetics investigates their interplay.
How our minds engage
With proportion in nature
And art,
How and why the sunset
Plays upon the heart.
Color and shape tickle neurons, spark delight
Hotwire our emotions
Setting our synapses alight.
The amygdala leaps
At a vivid hue,
The prefrontal cortex
Responds too
Fluent in meaning
Of depth and form,
In this cerebrally artful storm.
Beauty still
Outranks science,
It's a case of neural compliance.
Cloudia Charters
An awesome gluteus maximus causes my neurons to dance and play.
DeleteNowhere in the summary did I see mention of cravings for chocolate.
ReplyDeleteThat's a good thing.
DeleteMaking progress, the girls went from C-ravings to D-ravings 🤪
ReplyDeleteAre we going to be D-raving them?
DeleteMore evidence that addiction is not simply a character defect.
ReplyDeleteExactly.
DeleteNot sure if it is the same, but for years I ate far too much chocolate and icecream, felt awful if I din't have any, but I got to the point where I remembered the years before that, when both were a sometimes treat and I got to thinking about what I did during the days back then and tried to copy that. I remembered the satisfying feeling of having finished all the housework needed that day and being able to read all afternoon until the kids got home from school. All that changed when I went back to work, but now that I'm retired I'm trying to get back to those days and have currently managed to NOT eat chocolate every day or even every week and I've given up ice cream altogether.
ReplyDelete