When I went to post something yesterday for today I found this at the top of the posts.
I had no idea what this was about nor could I figure it out from this message. Well, it turns out that blogger sent me an email also. And this was about our friend LJ, AKA Loony John. It was post number 4650 from January 2020, 2 1/2 years ago! Blogger suddenly had the need to restrict viewing to it. Here's the letter...
************
Hello,
As you may know, our Community Guidelines
(https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we
allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "4650 - Troll" was flagged to us for review. This post was put behind a warning for readers because it contains sensitive content; the post is visible at http://mikenet707.blogspot.com/2020/01/4650-troll.html. Your blog readers must acknowledge the warning before being able to read the post/blog.
Why was your blog post put behind a warning for readers?
Your content has been evaluated according to our Adult Content policy.
Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more.
We apply warning messages to posts that contain sensitive content. If you are interested in having the status reviewed, please update the content to adhere to Blogger's Community Guidelines. Once the content is updated, you may republish it at https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=30622695&postId=591963236534214015.
This will trigger a review of the post.
For more information, please review the following resources:
Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy
Sincerely,
The Blogger Team
**************
So you can still see it. You just have to hit another button.
The only reason I can figure out what blogger's problem was, was that there are some 4 letter words that LJ said on his websites. So I eliminated any potty words and resubmitted the post. We'll see what happens.
And what's funny is that LJ (LJ are you listening?) deleted all the links I found that were his. All that research for nothing! Darn!
But the biggest problem that really ticked me off was the post number 4650. I used it TWICE! Not that I haven't done that before but I usually find them and fix them. Too late for that one.
!Update from blogger! Before I even posted!
************
Hello,
We have re-evaluated the post titled "4650 - Troll" against Community Guidelines https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy. Upon review, the post has been reinstated. You may access the post at http://mikenet707.blogspot.com/2020/01/4650-troll.html.
Sincerely,
The Blogger Team
**************
How about that!
Posts
12 comments:
That would do my head in - which doesn't take much these days. I am glad that you were able to sort it out.
Sue - I should have kept a copy of the stuff I deleted. Oh well.
What a lot of fuss and bother.
River - Over a big bunch of nothing from 2 1/2 years ago.
You CAN fight City Hall! It's interesting, though, that it took so long for Blogger to find it, or for some random reader to complain about it. A few years ago, I got a notice from Blogger telling me I had to remove a photo they said I had used without permission. The offending picture turned out to be a widely-distributed photo with no apparent use restrictions. I sighed, took it off the post, and all was well. The offending post was, at the time, about a year old.
That post was before I found your blog, so of course I had to go back and read it.
We are not Google customers.
We are a product they sell.
I'm glad you were able to sort through this mess. It's just frustrating that we have to. I think blogger looks are emails and issues once every 2 years. They read 5 and never return.
Do you slay dragons too?? That you asked your in
The dictation kept running. Please excuse that 😸
Hello everyone! I been berry berry busy today. 2 two hour zoom meetings, grand daughter duty, grocery store, trash night, and there was something else... I forget... I thought I was retired!
John - Your comment just showed up on 10-7-22.
Post a Comment