Ah the good ol' days at work. This meme probably fits most work places.
This brings back memories of the rating system at the phone company (and probably many more companies). 1 to 5. 1 is the worst. 5 is the best.
Back around '91 the phone company told all the divisions that to many people were rated 4's and 5's. That more people should be rated 2, 3 or 4. You know, in the middle. So a lot of divisions re-rated people. Some people got 2's. They were told a 2 was not bad but that they need to improve a little to get back to a 3. "Trust us".
Then in '93 came the layoffs. Guess what. Anyone that had a 2 in any rating category in any of the last 3 years? GONE! So even if you "improved", tough shit. You're outta here.
Some people were shuffled to other departments (me) to fill spots because of qualifications needed for a position. I was moved to a division that didn't buy into the 'downgrade everyone' new way of rating people.
A year later, more layoffs. Guess who was low man on the rating system list? All week people in my department had to re-interview for their job. 5's were interviewed first, then 4's, then us 3's.
Friday came and went and I still didn't know if I was going to have a job the next week. It was the longest weekend of my life.
Monday comes. Monday morning comes and goes. It's Monday afternoon around 2:45. (I remember the time) I finally found out I wouldn't be laid off. Tuesday morning they started laying people off.
Too damn close for someone with 25 years of service. I hung in until 31 years then fled while I still had my sanity. And there was more BS in those last years. Maybe for another post.
3 comments:
Mike, they totally did a number on everybody! They changed the perceived significance of the ratings, artificially dropping the means from the 4 to 5 range to the 2s and 3s.
Than you for your kindness and support when I got some noise from trolls. You are really nice!
We went from a 5 point scale with decent cash bonuses for 4s and 5s when I first started, to a 3 point with much smaller cash awards for 3s, to 2 -- meets expectations, does not meet expectations -- with no incentives.
That just totally sucks.
Post a Comment