Showing posts with label Fascinating info. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fascinating info. Show all posts

Friday, April 20, 2012

1864 - Taxes

The Huffington Post did a top ten tax charts article. Below is one of them. Don't read this if you like complaining about taxes.

The United States (including both the federal government and the states) collects less in taxes as a share of the economy than nearly any other developed country.

Click it to big it.

For the whole article and 9 other charts go to the link above.

 

Thursday, April 19, 2012

1863 - Books

Well the “most challenged” books list of 2011 is out from the American Library Association.


Here's this list of the top ten....

1. ttyl; ttfn; l8r, g8r(series), by Lauren Myracle
2. The Color of Earth (series), by Kim Dong Hwa
3. The Hunger Games trilogy, by Suzanne Collins
4. My Mom’s Having A Baby! A Kid’s Month-by-Month Guide to Pregnancy, by Dori Hillestad Butler
5. The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, by Sherman Alexie
6. Alice (series), by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor
7. Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley
8. What My Mother Doesn’t Know, by Sonya Sones
9. Gossip Girl (series), by Cecily Von Ziegesar
10. To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee



Well I've heard of two of them. But the first one caught my eye. Who is Lauren Myracle and why is she at the top of the list? Well from Wikipedia they say - Her books continue to be challenged in school libraries, usually for scenes of alleged sexuality, homosexuality, or alcohol use. Seems like typical middle schools stuff to me. What the problem?

Then it goes on to say about the book ttyl - ttyl was the first-ever novel to be written entirely in instant messages. Well... now I not only think her book should be banned I think she should be killed! I don't think I could look up a whole books worth of IM. Maybe she'll write a translated 800 page sequel.



 

Monday, April 16, 2012

1860 - XY XX

If you have Netflix you may have run across some new entries from TED. (I have a link on the sidebar.) They have been putting together groups of talks for Netflix. In this one group called 'Sex, Secrets, and Love' there are 12 talks. Some short (5 minutes), some a little longer (15 minutes).

I was listening to the last talk and went HEY! I did a post on this awhile back. (POST 388, also on the sidebar) But Alice Dreger has taken this a step further with her talk 'Is anatomy destiny?'. You can be XX or XY and still have a few anomalies.

She mentions that a few states now have a marriage requirement of one man one woman. She says prove your only a man or a woman and not both. (She also talks about the wisdom of the founding fathers.)

Friday, April 13, 2012

1857 - Believers and Questioners

It's your lucky day. Friday the 13th for REAL.

A friend found this comment in an article. This can be kind of confusing at first. But read the whole thing. This is not about religion. This is one of those reads where the writer put all the right words togther.

********


On Believers and Questioners

Person #1: [States a plausible theory concerning how the government may have conducted a nefarious operation and then lied to the public about it.]
Person #2: That's impossible. There would have to have been so many people involved. Someone would have talked.

Who is right: Person #1 or Person #2?

No matter how much research Person #1 does, he can never attain absolute certainty about his theory. Absolute certainty about empirical matters is impossible. See Rene Descartes, Meditations I. However, the difference between Person #1 and Person #2 is not in the truth-value of their respective beliefs, but rather their orientation towards truth itself.

Person #2 is a Believer whereas Person #1 is a Questioner. Most Questioners used to be Believers; it is rare to find a Believer who used to be a Questioner.

Questioners are a tortured lot. On one hand, they are constantly attempting to save Believers from their certainty in the "consensus opinion." On the other hand, Questioners are constantly attempting to test those few beliefs that they have attained, which they acknowledge to have been imperfectly established. This is a never-ending task and the Questioners are never satisfied.

Believers, by contrast, spend most of their time in blissful ignorance. They see the world as "given" and spend their time worrying about things like sports, interpersonal relationships or career advancement. While some Believers get their worldview from watching or reading the News, most get it by osmosis, by referring to what "most people think" as a guide.

Believers and Questioners are fundamentally at odds. Questioners either view Believers as simpletons or (as stated above) as naive souls to be saved. While many Questioners find Believers boring or pathetic, Questioners do not usually hate Believers. However, Believers invariably detest Questioners. See Plato, The Trial of Socrates.

The reason for Believer's hate of the Questioner is based on the fact that the Questioner, simply by posing the question, succeeds in momentarily jolting the Believer out of his blissful ignorance. This momentary jolt is painful, of course, which causes the Believer to recoil at whatever idea the Questioner had momentarily created in his mind. The Believer's salve is to reject that idea outright as preposterous. He will rely on any handy method to do so.

The "someone would have talked" argument is a handy method that Believers use to get rid of an uncomfortable idea. If the "someone would have talked" phenomenon is as true as the law of gravity, then why, the Questioner asks, does the government go to the pains of conducting background checks? Why did no one talk about Operation Northwoods before it became declassified? Why does barely anyone talk about it now?

The Questioner is relentless. If he goes to too far, though, the Believer is going to have to rely on other means to get back to the blissful state to which he has become attached. When he fails to refute the Believer on his own, he will resort to others. He will turn to other Believers and say "Look at this guy! How crazy is he!?" The other Believers will be quick to rally around the irked Believer-cum-leader. Before you know it, the Questioner has become an outcast. Or worse.

When the Believers are done with him, the Questioner will eventually become "no one."

This is the reason why the "someone would have talked" argument fails: because whoever talks is no longer someone worth being listened to, at least as far as the Believer is concerned.

But I wouldn't try to explain this to a Believer, if I were you.

 

Monday, April 09, 2012

1853 - How much will this cost?

I never saw this coming. I don't know if the problem this solves will be worth the cost. What problem? Somebody parking to close to you in the parking lot. This video is from 2010 so it hasn't caught on too fast yet.



 

Friday, March 16, 2012

1829 - The Twins Who Share a Body

Is this one of those things that everybody but me knows about? Abigail and Brittany Hensel - conjoined twins. Two people from the belly button up. One person from the belly button down. OK so I sort of stole this from Natures' Mighty Pictures but just this one, not all of them.

Here's a 45 minute video of their life up to about 16 years old. They are 22 years old now according to wikipedia.

Click the title to watch this on Youtube.


There are more short videos HERE.

 

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

1825 - Homelessness cost

There's an interesting link on the sidebar right now. Politifact is checking out if a statement is true or not that homelessness costs taxpayers $40,000 a year per person. Their conclusion? Mostly true.

(I'm giving this guy a buck.)


From the article...

"They randomly ricochet through very expensive services..."

"We learned that you could either sustain people in homelessness for $35,000 to $150,000 a year, or you could literally end their homelessness for $13,000 to $25,000 a year,"


It's a short but informative article. And it's all true because it's on the internet.



OH OH, Friday the 13th on a Tuesday. Do you know what that means? If you do tell me so we both know.

Friday, March 09, 2012

1821 - Genes

This is one of those things that when I run across it I think, "Have I seen this before?" But the more I looked at it the more it seemed I hadn't seen it.


It's a genetics project supported by National Geographics that follows humans out of Africa and around the world. And! You get to participate if you want to. All for only $99.95. Hey, it's a deal.

But if you just want to look at all the info on the site it will keep you busy for awhile. Below is a screen shot of one of the pages. Try and find it.
Click it to big it.

Update - I added this to my sidebar 'other interesting sites'.
 

Saturday, March 03, 2012

1815 - Top and Bottom

I'm continuing with the charts and graphs theme. I found an article about the feelings of wellbeing in the different states. It's a Gallup poll. Nobody would lie to a Gallup pollster would they?

Let's start off with the overall map. There's a little bit of a trend for their three categories of high, middle, low. The Midwest seems to be loooowwww. As a matter of fact if you look at the charts with the numbers, in the lowest 10 states are Missouri (me), Arkansas (Jay), and Ohio (Matt-man).





So what does this mean? Besides not much. The article says some of it's based on - enough money for food, shelter, and medicine. Hawaii is number one? Isn't it one of the highest cost of living states there are? Maybe with gas prices going up we'll all get happier!

And then there are the numbers themselves. Hawaii 70.2, Nevada 65.0. A spread of 5 points? Lets see what the margin of error is...

For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point. The margin of sampling error for most states is ±1 to ±2 percentage points, but is as high as ±4 points for states with smaller population sizes...

So 95% of the survey is probably ± 1 to 4 percent accurate. So basically ..... EVERY STATE IS THE SAME!!!!!

 

Monday, February 27, 2012

1810 - INTJ

If anybody has even taken a Meyers Briggs test those letters just jump out at you. They are one of the sixteen different personalities as described by the test. Or the many similar tests that mimic the MB test.

Researching the INTJ brought me to a site that had '10 Myths About Introverts' on it. I searched for the origin of the list and think I found it here at CARL KINGDOM. (not a long read)

As I read the list, which is loosely based on a book he mentions, I kept going yep, yep, yep ... to 10 yeps. If you know any introverted people, you should send them the list and the link. Don't expect an immediate response.


Here's the 10 myths...

Myth #1 – Introverts don’t like to talk.
This is not true. Introverts just don’t talk unless they have something to say. They hate small talk. Get an introvert talking about something they are interested in, and they won’t shut up for days.

Myth #2 – Introverts are shy.
Shyness has nothing to do with being an Introvert. Introverts are not necessarily afraid of people. What they need is a reason to interact. They don’t interact for the sake of interacting. If you want to talk to an Introvert, just start talking. Don’t worry about being polite.

Myth #3 – Introverts are rude.
Introverts often don’t see a reason for beating around the bush with social pleasantries. They want everyone to just be real and honest. Unfortunately, this is not acceptable in most settings, so Introverts can feel a lot of pressure to fit in, which they find exhausting.

Myth #4 – Introverts don’t like people.
On the contrary, Introverts intensely value the few friends they have. They can count their close friends on one hand. If you are lucky enough for an introvert to consider you a friend, you probably have a loyal ally for life. Once you have earned their respect as being a person of substance, you’re in.

Myth #5 – Introverts don’t like to go out in public.
Nonsense. Introverts just don’t like to go out in public FOR AS LONG. They also like to avoid the complications that are involved in public activities. They take in data and experiences very quickly, and as a result, don’t need to be there for long to “get it.” They’re ready to go home, recharge, and process it all. In fact, recharging is absolutely crucial for Introverts.

Myth #6 – Introverts always want to be alone.
Introverts are perfectly comfortable with their own thoughts. They think a lot. They daydream. They like to have problems to work on, puzzles to solve. But they can also get incredibly lonely if they don’t have anyone to share their discoveries with. They crave an authentic and sincere connection with ONE PERSON at a time.

Myth #7 – Introverts are weird.
Introverts are often individualists. They don’t follow the crowd. They’d prefer to be valued for their novel ways of living. They think for themselves and because of that, they often challenge the norm. They don’t make most decisions based on what is popular or trendy.

Myth #8 – Introverts are aloof nerds.
Introverts are people who primarily look inward, paying close attention to their thoughts and emotions. It’s not that they are incapable of paying attention to what is going on around them, it’s just that their inner world is much more stimulating and rewarding to them.

Myth #9 – Introverts don’t know how to relax and have fun.
Introverts typically relax at home or in nature, not in busy public places. Introverts are not thrill seekers and adrenaline junkies. If there is too much talking and noise going on, they shut down. Their brains are too sensitive to the neurotransmitter called Dopamine. Introverts and Extroverts have different dominant neuro-pathways. Just look it up.

Myth #10 – Introverts can fix themselves and become Extroverts.
A world without Introverts would be a world with few scientists, musicians, artists, poets, filmmakers, doctors, mathematicians, writers, and philosophers. That being said, there are still plenty of techniques an Extrovert can learn in order to interact with Introverts. (Yes, I reversed these two terms on purpose to show you how biased our society is.) Introverts cannot “fix themselves” and deserve respect for their natural temperament and contributions to the human race. In fact, one study (Silverman, 1986) showed that the percentage of Introverts increases with IQ.

 

Sunday, February 26, 2012

1809 - Gas mileage

Popular Mechanics has an article about small cars and gas mileage. It seems Chevy is coming out with a twelve foot long car called the Spark. An electric car? No no, I think they just want the name to sound electric. The American public wouldn't fall for deceptive advertising would they?

So here's a little diddy from the article.


...the main reason to drive such a small car would be: (a) that it's cheap and (b) that it gets great fuel economy.

Ehhhhh maybe not. Go read the article.

It ends with 'Every car design is a compromise.' That's true. And who wants to drive a small car and get killed, right? Let's drive pickups and be safe. Like this guy.... oops. (Yes there's a scrunched pickup under the front of the first bus.)


 

Saturday, February 25, 2012

1808 - Jerk

So your sitting there watching TV and you start to doze off. Suddenly your body jumps a little. Not a lot. Just enough to bounce you back into total conciousness.

What happened? Why you had a hypnic jerk. Or to be more precise, a hypnagogic myoclonic twitch. Is that a bad thing? As always, it depends. And it really depends on your trust in Wikipedia.


Article contains wessel words? Hey, sometimes wessel words are good. They can really get a point across. Anyway the article starts off as follows...

A hypnic jerk, hypnagogic jerk, sleep start, or night start, is an involuntary myoclonic twitch which occurs during hypnagogia, just as a person is beginning to fall asleep, often causing them to awaken suddenly for a second. Physically, hypnic jerks resemble the "jump" experienced by a person when startled, often accompanied by a falling sensation. A higher occurrence in people with irregular sleep schedules is reported.


It's a short article that doesn't take much time unless you want more info and start following links and references. Go for it.


And then I found a band named...


 

Sunday, February 19, 2012

1802 - Sleepy time

How much sleep are you supposed to get? 8 hours? 9 hours? If you're John, 4 hours. (John's planning on catching up when he's dead.)


Well I found a sleep calculator that adds a new twist to the sleep number. It's the sleep cycle figured into sleep time. Again the average doesn't fit everyone but we'll assume it does. What's one cycle of all 4 stages of sleep? 90 minutes.

So the sleep calculator is saying you should go to sleep / set your alarm in intervals of 90 minutes. They say waking up with an alarm in the middle of a cycle can make for a sleepy day.

To much trouble to figure out? Well guess what! Just punch in some numbers and presto! Well prest anyway. Make sure to change the AM/PM first.

SLEEP CALCULATOR.


********


And then there was this video..




 

Saturday, February 18, 2012

1801 - Logos

I got an email about some interesting logos. You all know about the arrow in the FedEx logo right?


Well there are a few more logos out there with embedded information in them. Lets take a look.


2nd and 3rd t's are two people sharing a tortilla over a bowl of salsa.




Probably the worlds' most famous bike race. The R in Tour is a cyclist, yellow circle front wheel of bicycle.



Arrow probably means Amazon has everything from A to Z.



There is a sideways chocolate kiss between K and I.



There is a bear if you look closely at image of Matterhorn. Toblerone
chocolate bars originated in Berne, Switzerland whose symbol is the bear.



See 31 embedded in the B R? Thirty one-derful flavors!



Northwest Airlines. Circle is a compass. Guess which direction the arrow in upper left corner (or beginning of W) is pointing?



See the gorilla and lioness?



Smiley face is also a g like in goodwill.



Used to be the emblem for the Milwaukee Brewers. Baseball glove forms an M and a B. Logo was designed by a college art student

 

Saturday, February 11, 2012

1794 - 180 degrees

Have you been to Bilbo's cartoon Saturday yet? Are you happy? I can fix that.


How about - 15 Ways Your Desk Job Is Destroying Your Body

Some of these are old concerns. But some are new looks at old problems. Anyway they are worth revisiting.

1. Sitting at your desk all day

Sitting for lengthy periods is terrible for your body. Aches and pains are the least of your problems -- it can lead to an early death. You're at a higher risk of muscular skeletal disorders, obesity, diabetes, cancer, heart disease and more, even if you work out regularly.

2. Bad air quality in your building

The EPA calls it "Sick Building Syndrome." The air inside a building can be up to 100 times dirtier than outside, and you're exposed to a variety of unhealthy gases and chemicals. There are pollutants in the air conditioning, toxic particles, dangerous bacteria and mold all flying around, especially in buildings that aren't well taken care of.

3. Over-exposure to printers and photocopiers

Photocopiers are a source of potentially deadly ozone if the filter isn't periodically changed, and even small amounts can cause chest pain and irritation. Laser printers do too, along with toner particles that can get in your lungs and blood stream, which could lead to lung disease and other ailments.

4. Spending too much time on a hot laptop

Anyone can experience skin problems from the heat if you use a laptop on your lap instead of a desk or or stand, but there's particularly concerning news for men. NYU researchers found that laptops can raise the temperature of the scrotum, which would affect a man's sperm count.

5. Working for over 10 hours per day

European researchers found that people who work 11 hours or more every day have a 60% greater risk of a multitude of cardiovascular problems, including heart attack and angina.

6. Endlessly staring at a computer screen

Even though computer screens don't give off radiation, the strain from staring over long periods of time can cause harm to your vision, though many effects are temporary. Beyond that, you can also experience headaches and migraines.

7. Being exposed to way too much light

Over-illumination can cause you many more problems than an everyday headache. Our body treats over-illumination as total darkness, so it messes with our internal clocks. Health problems can include a particularly high level of fatigue, stress, high blood pressure and an increased risk of certain carcinomas.

8. Tight deadlines

You get stressed out when you have to meet a strict deadline, which can affect your learning and memory according to Science Daily. This sort of short-term stress can be just as bad as stress that lasts weeks or months.

9. Being really, really bored

Boredom can actually shorten your life, according to researchers. A study from University College London showed that those who complain of boredom are more likely to die young, and those who report high levels of tedium are much more likely to die from heart disease or stroke. It also puts you at higher risk for workplace accidents.

10. Dirty keyboards

Keyboards can be a breeding ground for bacteria if not kept clean. Microbiologists found that keyboards can even have up to five times as many bacteria as a bathroom, and can include dangerous ones like e.Coli and coliforms -- both commonly associated with food poisoning -- along with staphylococcus, which causes a range of infections.

11. Germs in high-traffic areas

Your keyboard isn't the only bacteria farm in the office. Door and faucet knobs, handles, elevator and printer buttons, hand-shakes and more all are hotspots for bacteria. Microbes are everywhere, and some can even kill you.

12. Typing too much

Excessive amounts of typing is a well-known cause of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which is a painful wrist strain that can go up your arm. CTS can get bad enough to cause permanent nerve damage and muscle wasting.

13. Keeping your mouse in the same spot

If your mouse stays in the same spot all day, you can be prone to repetitive strain injury (RSI). Upper limb RSI occurs when your tendons are straining more than they should for long periods of time, which can be because of movement repetition, a sustained awkward position, or prolonged pressing against hard surfaces.

14. Smartphone overuse

People who use their smartphones heavily to text and email are prone to muscle fatigue and "Blackberry Thumb," which is a type of RSI. The effects can get so bad that the pain can reach all the way up to your wrist and can be utterly debilitating to your hands.

15. Eating fast food for lunch

Most office-folk go out for an unhealthy lunch once in a while -- some more than others, but even the occasional indulgence has its negative effects. A portion of fast food usually has around double the calories to another similar food of the same size, and they have a lot of oxidized fat, which increases the risk of heart disease.


Hey, there's nothing like a post on 2/11/12 at 12:11.

Thursday, February 09, 2012

1792 - Go get 'em girls

I found an article about Sheryl Sandberg. Who? Why the newest female billionaire from Facebook. But I also found a TED talk by her. Watch it. Copy it. Send it to all your daughters and granddaughters.



 

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

1776 - The newt, the ship

I should be doing a patriotic post for post number 1776. Well maybe this is. Patriotic information about a presidential candidate.

Here's some more info about the newt. It seems the wanna be candidate for the family values party was a deadbeat dad to his kids. Here's a link to the ARTICLE. But I'm going to copy the whole article here to make sure the link doesn't go dead.


********

I'm generally of the camp that believes a politician's personal life has little to no bearing on whether or not he can be a good leader. Meaning, I don't really care whether or not my president had an affair with an intern or sneaks cigarettes in the Oval Office, as long as he or she is smart, fair, responsible and honest (about things like taxes and war, not sex and smoking). But the latest dirt on Newt Gingrich is basically proof that Gingrich is NOT fair, responsible, or honest. (The jury is still out on "smart.")

According to recently released divorce documents from Gingrich's split with first wife Jackie Battley, the Republican was more than just a crappy husband. He was also allegedly a deadbeat dad!

The papers filed by Gingrich's then-wife state:

Despite repeated notice to plaintiff and requests by defendant, plaintiff has failed and refused to voluntarily provide reasonable support sufficient to include payment of usual and normal living expenses, including drugs, water, sewage, garbage, gas, electric and telephone service for defendant and the minor children ... As a result, many of such accounts are two or three months past due with notices of intent to cut off service and gas and electricity.

Nice, really nice. He was so caught up in his political career -- or pursuit of second wife Callista, perhaps -- that he couldn't be bothered to make sure his kids had electricity? Apparently things got so desperate for the family that the church collected donations to help pay the bills until a judge finally ordered Gingrich to make monthly payments.

Financially neglecting to support his own flesh and blood is, to me, a "personal" issue that is extremely relevant to Gingrich's presidential potential. There's a tremendous difference between a politician
indulging a vice and a man failing to take care of his family. Is Gingrich really going to care about the countless Americans affected by the recession when he allowed his children to literally become charity cases?


********




A grounded ship. Fix it and float it? Nope. Cut it up and haul it away. 29 pictures.

 

Saturday, January 21, 2012

1772 - Climate change

This is a graph from the following video. The video is a little over six minutes. It's from PlanetSave.com which seems to talk in logical facts. Go figure!!





 

Friday, January 20, 2012

1771 - Joplin tornado

Here's some snippets from an article in Popular Science on the Joplin tornado last year. Here's the WHOLE ARTICLE.


... asked several climate experts to answer the question: Is extreme weather linked to global warming? Andrew Watson, a professor of environmental sciences at the University of East Anglia in England, responded, “My answer to this question as posed is no. However, if you were to ask instead whether I expect that human-caused climate change will lead to more extreme weather events, the answer would be yes.”

This type of reticence surely comes in part from healthy scientific skepticism—the hesitancy to overinterpret data and the impulse to accumulate decades’ worth of statistics before drawing conclusions. But it also seems likely that climate scientists are triply cautious with their public statements because of they way they’ve been dragged into the culture wars. Recall that the university where Andrew Watson works was implicated, and then vindicated, in the phony scandal called Climategate, in which skeptics used out-of-context bits from stolen e-mails to make it sound as if researchers were engaged in some great conspiracy. Climate scientists have become the abortion doctors of the scientific establishment: maligned, ridiculed, harassed, and even physically threatened. Several climate scientists in Australia, which had been debating a tax on carbon emissions, received so many death threats that their universities moved their offices to “secure facilities.”

... ...

The meteorologist Jeff Masters wrote on his blog, “Any one of the extreme weather events of 2010”—a year whose litany of disasters reads much like last year’s—“or 2011 could have occurred naturally sometime during the past 1,000 years. But it is highly improbable that the remarkable extreme weather events of 2010 and 2011 could have all happened in such a short period of time without some powerful climate-altering force at work.”

Despite all of this, a Pew poll conducted in 2010 found that just 59 percent of Americans think there is solid evidence that the planet is warming—and that’s down from 79 percent in 2006. Only 27 percent of Americans surveyed in a different poll said climate change was their greatest environmental concern.

In 2009, 29 scientists published a paper in the journal Nature titled “A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” In it, they listed a series of data points that will determine whether the planet remains habitable. The highest “safe” concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 350 parts per million. The current level is 387 ppm, and it is increasing by 2 ppm annually. There’s no reason to believe that trend will reverse or even slow down anytime soon. In 2010, as the weather became increasingly catastrophic, carbon-dioxide emissions increased by the largest percentage ever recorded.


 

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

1768 - Missspelllling

I found this list of misspelled words. The biggest problem I have is the i/e e/i not so set in stone rule. And with spell check these days sometimes you don't even notice when things are getting corrected.

But what's really funny is blogger spell check didn't pick up all the misspelled words. Most of the time I can tell if a word doesn't look right. But sometimes, freind friend, I can't.

MISSPELLING / CORRECT SPELLING
acheive achieve
accidently accidentally
adrenalin adrenaline
adress address
alot a lot
alright all right
athiest atheist
beggining beginning
bereu bureau
beleive believe
beleif belief
bisness business
breath breathe
catagory category
committment commitment
concieve conceive
copywrite copyright
decaffinated decaffeinated
decathalon decathlon
definately definitely
desireable desirable
diety deity
dissppoint disappoint
dispell dispel
ecstacy ecstasy
embarass embarrass
enviroment environment
expresso espresso
extremly extremely
facist fascist
Febuary February
flourescent fluorescent
fourty forty
freind friend
guage gauge
goverment government
grammer grammar
grievious grievous
harrass harass
hemorage hemorrhage
heros heroes
hieght, heigth height
hygeine hygiene
hym hymn
independance independence
inate innate
innoculate inoculate
it's its (possessive pronoun)
judgement judgment
knowlege knowledge
lazer laser
libary library
lightening lightning
maintainance maintenance
managable manageable
millenium millennium
mischievious mischievous
mispell misspell
mit mitt
monestary monastery
monkies monkeys
morgage mortgage
mountian mountain
neccessary necessary
neice niece
nickle nickel
nineth ninth
ninty ninety
noone no one or no-one
noticable noticeable
nuptuals nuptials
occured occurred
occurence occurrence
occurrance occurrence
oppurtunity opportunity
paralell parallel
pasttime pastime
pavillion pavilion
peice piece
percieve perceive
perserverance perseverance
persue pursue
posession possession
pertend pretend
potatoe potato
preceeding preceding
pronounciation pronunciation
priviledge privilege
recieve receive
reccomend recommend
rediculous ridiculous
reguardless regardless
remeber remember
restrant restaurant
roomate roommate or room-mate
rythm rhythm
sacreligious sacrilegious
seige siege
sentance sentence
seperate separate
sieze seize
similiar similar
sincerly sincerely
speach speech
stationary stationery (office supplies term)
stragedy strategy
suggestable suggestible
supercede supersede
supposively supposedly
suprise surprise
thier their
throughly thoroughly
tommorrow tomorrow
tounge tongue
triathalon triathlon
ukelele ukulele
vaccuum vacuum
vegeterian vegetarian
vermillion vermilion
video's videos (plural)
villian villain
Wendesday Wednesday
wierd weird (exception: Wierd programming language)
writting writing
your you're (you are)